[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rumpdisk status
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: rumpdisk status |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Nov 2020 08:21:17 +0100 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) |
Damien Zammit, le mar. 10 nov. 2020 13:17:52 +1100, a ecrit:
> On 10/11/20 10:39 am, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >> sdd2 is / that boots with rumpdisk.static
> >> sdd3 is the second partition I am trying to mount with the injected
> >> translator
> >
> > That's far... Unless rumpdisk is built with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 64, its
> > off_t etc. will be 32bit, thus probably issues with 4GiB-ness.
>
> It seems to be compiled with -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 already by default:
But is rumpkernel itself also built with it?
Really, better actually *test* that offsets are getting properly
propagated.
Samuel
- Re: rumpdisk status, (continued)
- Re: rumpdisk status, Samuel Thibault, 2020/11/07
- Re: rumpdisk status, Damien Zammit, 2020/11/08
- Re: rumpdisk status, Samuel Thibault, 2020/11/08
- Re: rumpdisk status, Samuel Thibault, 2020/11/08
- Re: rumpdisk status, Damien Zammit, 2020/11/09
- Re: rumpdisk status, Samuel Thibault, 2020/11/09
- Re: rumpdisk status, Samuel Thibault, 2020/11/09
- Re: rumpdisk status, Damien Zammit, 2020/11/09
- Re: rumpdisk status, Samuel Thibault, 2020/11/09
- Re: rumpdisk status, Damien Zammit, 2020/11/09
- Re: rumpdisk status,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: rumpdisk status, Damien Zammit, 2020/11/10
- Re: rumpdisk status, Samuel Thibault, 2020/11/10
- Re: rumpdisk status, Damien Zammit, 2020/11/13
- Re: rumpdisk status, Samuel Thibault, 2020/11/23
- Re: rumpdisk status, Damien Zammit, 2020/11/23
- Re: rumpdisk status, Samuel Thibault, 2020/11/24
- Re: rumpdisk status, Almudena Garcia, 2020/11/24
- Re: rumpdisk status, Damien Zammit, 2020/11/09
- Re: rumpdisk status, Samuel Thibault, 2020/11/09