[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: let's make libpager single-threaded
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: let's make libpager single-threaded |
Date: |
Mon, 5 May 2014 17:28:25 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Hello,
Justus Winter, le Mon 05 May 2014 17:23:10 +0200, a écrit :
> Just to make sure I got my idea across. With my change, a single
> thread would service all requests to disk pagers, another one would
> manage the requests to file pagers.
Sure.
> And those requests are mostly
> IO-bound, and as far as I understand it our IO layer cannot acommodate
> concurrent operations.
That is the current layer, yes, but I hope that the DDE or Rump layer
for disks does have concurrent operation support.
> If so, more threads does not mean getting more work done.
As of now, yes, that's why I was mentioning using just one thread for
now.
Samuel
- Re: let's make libpager single-threaded, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/05
- Re: let's make libpager single-threaded, Justus Winter, 2014/05/05
- Re: let's make libpager single-threaded,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: let's make libpager single-threaded, Richard Braun, 2014/05/05
- Re: let's make libpager single-threaded, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/05
- Re: let's make libpager single-threaded, Richard Braun, 2014/05/05
- Re: let's make libpager single-threaded, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/22
- Re: let's make libpager single-threaded, Richard Braun, 2014/05/27
- Re: let's make libpager single-threaded, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/29
- Re: let's make libpager single-threaded, Richard Braun, 2014/05/29
- Re: let's make libpager single-threaded, Justus Winter, 2014/05/30
- Re: let's make libpager single-threaded, Richard Braun, 2014/05/30
- Re: let's make libpager single-threaded, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/30