[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: let's make libpager single-threaded
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: let's make libpager single-threaded |
Date: |
Mon, 5 May 2014 16:55:19 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Richard Braun, le Mon 28 Apr 2014 16:55:17 +0200, a écrit :
> But it's certainly on the right path and shouldn't be far from being
> reliable (or at least, a lot more reliable than the current code).
It's an interesting alternative indeed. This however means our ext2fs
is not multithreaded any longer, which is a bit sad considered that
we'll want to go parallel in the end.
AIUI, Justus' second patch however now allows to limit the number of
threads, since the issue I had raised with it is solved by levelling the
requests into two separate buckets. Would it make sense to just limit
the number of threads to one, so as to get the same kind of performance
benefit without losing the potential for parallelism?
Samuel
- Re: let's make libpager single-threaded,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: let's make libpager single-threaded, Justus Winter, 2014/05/05
- Re: let's make libpager single-threaded, Richard Braun, 2014/05/05
- Re: let's make libpager single-threaded, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/05
- Re: let's make libpager single-threaded, Richard Braun, 2014/05/05
- Re: let's make libpager single-threaded, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/22
- Re: let's make libpager single-threaded, Richard Braun, 2014/05/27
- Re: let's make libpager single-threaded, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/29
- Re: let's make libpager single-threaded, Richard Braun, 2014/05/29
- Re: let's make libpager single-threaded, Justus Winter, 2014/05/30