[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug #63812] Discussion of conditional expressions in docs should mentio

From: G. Branden Robinson
Subject: [bug #63812] Discussion of conditional expressions in docs should mention `.if h`
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2023 06:36:55 -0500 (EST)

Follow-up Comment #6, bug #63812 (project groff):

[comment #5 comment #5:]
> The projected likelihood of introducing such a backwards-incompatible
feature is marginal at best, and indicative of feature creep at worst.

Muahahahaha.  You don't know of my plans for groff 1.24.

Long stories short, I want a `for` request that will iterate over
macros/strings/diversions, and new conditional operators to test for "nodes"
and for glyphs that are _actually defined_ in the current font, as opposed to
interposed via character definitions.


Reply to this item at:


Message sent via Savannah

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]