[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug #63812] Discussion of conditional expressions in docs should mentio

From: John Gardner
Subject: [bug #63812] Discussion of conditional expressions in docs should mention `.if h`
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2023 06:32:18 -0500 (EST)

Follow-up Comment #5, bug #63812 (project groff):

[comment #4 comment #4:]
> Here's what I have at the moment.
Looks good. One nanoscopic nitpick, which borders on bikeshedding:

> and GNU @code{troff} may provide additional operators in the future.
The projected likelihood of introducing such a backwards-incompatible feature
is marginal at best, and indicative of feature creep at worst. I wouldn't rule
the possibility out completely, but it's still not likely enough to warrant
mentioning in Groff's documentation.

(I told you it was a nitpickā€¦)


Reply to this item at:


Message sent via Savannah

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]