[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gettext vs. gnulib m4 macros
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: gettext vs. gnulib m4 macros |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Feb 2015 00:07:27 GMT |
How about the following list of .m4 files to be maintained in gettext?
codeset.m4 gettext.m4 iconv.m4 intldir.m4 intl.m4 intlmacosx.m4
lcmessage.m4 nls.m4 po.m4
Makes sense to me. Daiki, is it ok with you? (I suppose the other
files should then be moved into gnulib-m4 in the gettext repository?)
Thanks,
K
- gettext vs. gnulib m4 macros, Karl Berry, 2015/02/23
- Re: gettext vs. gnulib m4 macros, Paul Eggert, 2015/02/23
- Re: gettext vs. gnulib m4 macros, Karl Berry, 2015/02/23
- Re: gettext vs. gnulib m4 macros, Daiki Ueno, 2015/02/23
- Re: gettext vs. gnulib m4 macros, Paul Eggert, 2015/02/23
- Re: gettext vs. gnulib m4 macros, Karl Berry, 2015/02/24
- Re: gettext vs. gnulib m4 macros, Paul Eggert, 2015/02/24
- Re: gettext vs. gnulib m4 macros,
Karl Berry <=
- Re: gettext vs. gnulib m4 macros, Daiki Ueno, 2015/02/26