[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Bug in bearoffdump?

From: isambard mews
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Bug in bearoffdump?
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 15:33:56 +0000

Thanks! Out of interest, I was wondering if someone could give an example of a case where the 2 sided database would be different from the one-sided database? I had assumed that if you apply the database to both sides and have the full distribution, you could work out the optimal move just using this one-sided database?

Apologies if this is in the wrong list, happy to be directed to the appropriate list/forum.

From: Philippe Michel <address@hidden>
Sent: 31 December 2016 14:45
To: isambard mews
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Bug in bearoffdump?
On Tue, 27 Dec 2016, isambard mews wrote:

> I tested out bearoffdump on a test database using normal distribution
> format and got the following strange output (running on a 64bit Debian
> system). I was expecting a similar format to a non-ND database and
> wonder if this is a bug:

The problem is fixed in the current sources. If you use the debian package
I suppose you will have to wait until it is updated, but if you compiled
gnubg  yourself you can update it from cvs or get the only changed file

Best regards,

Philippe Michel

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]