[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Bug in bearoffdump?

From: Philippe Michel
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Bug in bearoffdump?
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 22:31:38 +0100 (CET)
User-agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07)

On Tue, 27 Dec 2016, isambard mews wrote:

I tested out bearoffdump on a test database using normal distribution format and got the following strange output (running on a 64bit Debian system). I was expecting a similar format to a non-ND database and wonder if this is a bug:

I was able to reproduce this result (with minor differences on the large numbers, probably due to different compilers and build options).

It is not clear that the problem is with bearoffdump, though. I'm inclined to think it is with makebearoff and that the -n flags creates a broken database.

The problem is not recent since a 2008 snapshot has the same issue. On the other hand, this post from the list archive shows that it used to work in 2002 : http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-10/msg00336.html

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]