[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Confused

From: Ian Shaw
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Confused
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 17:04:14 +0000

Spot on, that's what I was looking for. 
-- Ian
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Petch [mailto:address@hidden 
Sent: 15 June 2015 16:50
To: Ian Shaw; address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Confused

On 2015-06-15 8:39 AM, Ian Shaw wrote:
> scientifically cautious?

Yes. The only study I am aware of was the Deprelli one and I personally do feel 
that there is a definite trend in the error rate that indicate that the 
even/odd ply effect has been reduced. But it was one study. I do remain 
optimistic that over a greater number of positions the trend would hold in bot 

This post (and the thread in general) of Philippe's may give you a better idea:


Michael Petch
GNU Backgammon Maintainer / Developer
OpenPGP FingerPrint=D81C 6A0D 987E 7DA5 3219 6715 466A 2ACE 5CAE 3304

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]