|Subject:||Re: [Bug-gnubg] Use of Two-Sided DB in matches|
|Date:||Sat, 05 Sep 2009 03:25:29 -0600|
Okay, I am tired. Scrap what I said below. They were all the same. The player names changed and I got things a bit mixed up in the process.
The data you gave in your post below doesn’t match the GnubgID I am entering. The bearoff output was for the person with checkers on 654 and 2 as person on roll. Your data is for the opposite. I may be missing something trivial here. Are you sure?
On 05/09/09 3:04 AM, "Michael Petch" <address@hidden> wrote:
It may be that I am dead tired and probably missing something. Can you give me the Gnubg ID (just the position) for your stats below? Because we are not looking at the same position. And I now see where all my confusion is coming from. Originally on BGO you posted this:
Now since I don’t have anyway of easily converting XBGid’s to Gnubg I decided to use the GnubgID from the data you retrieved from Gnubg in this post:
I have been blindly assuming that the 2 position were equal. After you posted below I realized they are different. In XBG you have the on roll person opposite to what you have for GnuBG. I have been copying and pasting the gnubgid out of this post all along. Its not the same.
However I just discovered in this post:
That its the same as your XBG. Can you clarify which position we are looking at? Right now, I am not analyzing the same one you are. I am confused. Thanks
On 05/09/09 2:06 AM, "Neil Robins" <address@hidden> wrote:
Those are the figures for opponent on roll.
With you on roll it's:
Position 169 104
Cubeless equity : +0.4707
Owned cube : +0.6734
Centered cube : +0.6598
Opponent owns cube : +0.4490
Bug-gnubg mailing list
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|