XG Money
play:
Analyzed in 1 ply Player Winning Chances: 73.53% (G: 0.00% B: 0.00%) Opponent Winning Chances: 26.47% (G: 0.00% B: 0.00%)
Cubeless Equities: No Double=+0.471, Double=+0.941
Cubeful Equities: No Double: +0.524 (-0.372) Double/Take: +0.896 Double/Drop: +1.000 (+0.104)
Best Cube action: Double / Take
XGID=--A-AAA------------b----b-:0:0:1:00:0:0:3:0:8
Score is X:0 O:0. +13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+ | | | O O | | | | O O | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |BAR| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | X X X X | +12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+ Pipcount X: 17 O: 14 X-O: 0-0 Cube : 1 X on roll, cube action
Analyzed in 2 ply Player Winning Chances: 73.54% (G: 0.00% B: 0.00%) Opponent Winning Chances: 26.46% (G: 0.00% B: 0.00%)
Cubeless Equities: No Double=+0.471, Double=+0.941
Cubeful Equities: No Double: +0.548 (-0.304) Double/Take: +0.851 Double/Drop: +1.000 (+0.149)
Best Cube action: Double / Take
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 8:01
AM
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Use of Two-Sided
DB in matches
Im getting tired. All the lookaheads in this case
will come right from the two sided database and have janowski applied to them
(I forgot that we arent in a contact position for a moment brain phart).
All the evals should come really fast because of this (even on larger plies).
On each lookahead the static evals from the database are reapplied with
janowski up to the given ply.
One other thing Id like to know. If you
take the same position as a money game in XBG can you also post the results.
Id be curious to see how the values between a XBGs money eval and Match eval
differ.
On 05/09/09 12:38 AM, "Michael Petch" <address@hidden>
wrote:
Not necessarily. Interestingly enough on one ply It
says double/take but that based on the potential 21 rolls and their
resultant equities (each that will also have janowski applied). It also
assumes the cube is seen within the plies that are given.
I have a
question for you. On simple 0 ply what are XBGs results? Would you post
them. Id be curious.
On 05/09/09 12:11 AM, "Neil Robins" <address@hidden>
wrote:
Surely,
therefore, at least 1-ply or higher should see the recube and the then
dead cube situation and go to the DB for an exact valid
value.
_______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg
mailing list address@hidden http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
|