|
From: | Michael Petch |
Subject: | Re: [Bug-gnubg] Handling ambiguous checker moves |
Date: | Thu, 09 Apr 2009 15:27:24 -0600 |
User-agent: | Microsoft-Entourage/12.15.0.081119 |
I don’t disagree with the concept of consistency. For example it may be intuitive for some that the bot always assume the higher die is moved first (Assuming using the higher roll is legal of course) This is how I personally would expect it to be treated (And that’s simple personal bias). From my viewpoint the hit or no hit is not the intuitive criteria.
My criteria would also make other situations simple. For example if you drag from the 24 to the 13 on a 6-5 roll and lets say the opponent has a blot on the 18 and 19pt which - course should the bot take? If you use a consistent method of always using the high roll first then you’d know ahead of time what the bot will do in this case too.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |