[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: upgrading GNU packages to GPLv3
From: |
Christian Anthon |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: upgrading GNU packages to GPLv3 |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Jul 2007 16:39:55 +0200 |
On 7/2/07, Achim Mueller <address@hidden> wrote:
Ok, remaining are:
- compile (Tom Tromey <address@hidden>)
- config.rpath (Gordon Matzigkeit <address@hidden>)
- mkinstalldirs (Noah Friedman <address@hidden>)
- ylwrap (Tom Tromey <address@hidden>)
These are autotools files and shouldn't be in cvs.
- pub_eval.c (Gerald Tesauro)
We must assume that Gerald has made some kind of agreement with
tesauro. Add an appropriate copyright and the gpl to this one.
- strdup.c (Gary Wong)
we don't need this anymore.
- gnubg.6 (Joern Thyssen, for the manpage?!)
certainly not gpl, gfdl if anything
- corecount.c (Intel?!)
This should be removed from CVS i think, unless we can clarify what
the license is. Only MS Windows user have benefit of this file anyway.
- erftest.c (Gary Wong)
I'll remove it. Doesn't all supported platforms have a built-in erf(),
so that we can remove erf.c as well.
-lib/isaac.c
-lib/isaac.h
-lib/isaacs.h
-lib/mt19937ar.copying
These files, I believe, are in public domain and not ours anyway,
leave them as they are.
sound files
- graphic files
- xml files (met, etc)
Many of them are not ours, a copyright would be a good idea if
possible. They shouldn't be gpl'ed though.
- files in non-src/
edit their source. It is always the source and not the result that is gpl'ed.
Christian.
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: upgrading GNU packages to GPLv3, Øystein Johansen, 2007/07/02