[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings
From: |
kvandoel |
Subject: |
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Sep 2003 19:46:33 +0200 (CEST) |
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Albert Silver wrote:
> > (jimbo ) 2604
> I'm sure I didn't play THAT well.... :-)
> P.S. Regarding your comment on my weirdness, my friends and family would
> all agree whole-heartedly.
Indeed, that game features postitive error rates. So maybe another
possible explanation for the discrepancy could be a bug in GBNUBG
analysis/statistics.
Let me try to isolate the bug and post it on a separate thread.
Kees
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, kvandoel, 2003/09/09
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, kvandoel, 2003/09/09
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, Albert Silver, 2003/09/09
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, kvandoel, 2003/09/10
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, kvandoel, 2003/09/10
- [Bug-gnubg] Re: ratings formula, checker play vs. cube, kvandoel, 2003/09/11
- [Bug-gnubg] Re: ratings formula, checker play vs. cube, kvandoel, 2003/09/12
- [Bug-gnubg] Re: ratings formula, checker play vs. cube, kvandoel, 2003/09/13
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, kvandoel, 2003/09/10
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, Albert Silver, 2003/09/10
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings,
kvandoel <=
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, kvandoel, 2003/09/14