Re: Réf . . . . : Re: [Bug-gnubg] Missed doubles problem ?

[Joern Thyssen]

On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 11:35:07PM +0200, Holger wrote
> At 20:58 29.08.2003 +0000, Joern Thyssen wrote:
> >On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 10:43:30PM +0200, Holger wrote
> >> At 19:37 29.08.2003 +0000, Joern Thyssen wrote:
> >>
> >> >Even though the positiion certainly looks lige a "too good" one gnubg
> >> >thinks it's around the DP due to the crude logic.
> >>
> >> Hmm, obviously, but why?
> >
> >Maybe I've lost track of this thread, but one double had an no double
> 
> Oops, no, I lost track. Sorry.
> 
> >equity of +0.959 and the other of 0.922. The first should be marked
> >around the TG point and the other around the DP. As I remember it, that
> >was exactly what happened?!
> 
> Yes, you're right. It's seemingly too late for me to look at the code and 
> distinguish >= and <=.  ;)

he he :-)

However, there is still the point about modifying the logic to use DP
and TG instead of the crude "<= 0.95" logic.

Using DP + (TG-DP)/2 as the division should work fine for "normal"
positions with TG>DP and esoteric positions with DP>TG since
DP+(TG-DP)/2=TG+(DP-TG)/2.

Jørn

pgp18qCEjGNgM.pgp
Description: PGP signature