Re: [Bug-gnubg] Win32 builds - new set of DLL

[Holger]

At 15:55 01.07.2003 +0200, Nardy Pillards wrote:
> For the time being, I propose to copy zlib-1.dll to zlib.dll and put it in 
> the gnubg directory.
> That way the libpng calls to zlib within gnubg will be made to that 
> zlib(-1).dll.
> (and thus: replace zlib.dll with that copied zlib-1.dll in the 
> Installation Archive also)

This renaming eventually only complicates matters. But I don't have a 
better solution.

> BTW: I don't think it is needed to put -zl in makefile, since gnubg is
> independent of zlib. (Can someone confirm this? If not, I will check one of
> those days).

Hmm, you may have a point here as it's not directly dependant. But I'm not 
really well versed in compiler and linker stuff. Somebody else?

Regards,

        Holger