Re: [Bug-gnubg] Win32 builds - new set of DLL

[Gabi at HotPOP]

Hi,

I checked my dlls, and found that the following two are just missing:
libiconv-2.dll
libintl-2.dll

The program runs fine, and does not complain about not finding them.
(However, it crashes when I ask for a hint - I'm still trying to find out
why.)

What are these dlls good for?  How come I can omit them?
I verified it - they're nowhere on my hard disk.

Thanks,
Gabi Shahar.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Holger" <address@hidden>
To: "Nardy Pillards" <address@hidden>; "GNUBackgammon bug
reporting" <address@hidden>
Sent: Friday, 27 June 2003 16:03
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Win32 builds - new set of DLL


At 14:27 27.06.2003 +0200, Nardy Pillards wrote:
>To follow Holger's builds (and 'A How to For Compiling'), I built gnubg.exe
>using the packages as proposed by Holger.
>
>When running gnubg.exe, two small problems arose:
>
>iconv.dll was not found (I extracted it from libiconv-1.9.bin.woe32.zip -
>GTK/Tor Lillqvist, but did not overwrite version 1.8 used for compile/link)

I just took the one from Øystein's installation archive. Øystein, do you
also have it from
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=25167 ?
I suggest to just use the newest version from there. Now it is
libiconv-1.9-w32.2.bin.woe32.zip .

>libintl-1.dll is still needed for GLib (I extracted it from
>libintl-0.10.40-tml-20020904.zip- GTK/Tor Lillqvist build)

So did I.

>List of needed DLLs:
>
>freetype-6.dll (2.1.4.1203; 357 KB; 030418)
>gdbm.dll (1.8.0.0; 38 KB; 020222)
>iconv.dll (N/A; 872 KB; 030517)
>libart_lgpl.dll (2.3.3.0; 82 KB; 020630)
>libgdk-0.dll (1.3.0.26; 466 KB; 021221)
>libglib-2.0-0.dll (2.2.1.0; 613 KB; 030205)
>libgmodule-2.0-0.dll (2.2.1.0; 38 KB; 030205)
>libgtk-0.dll (1.3.0.41; 1,535 KB; 021222)
>libiconv-2.dll (1.8.1134.7927; 905 KB; 030208)
>libintl-1.dll (N/A; 46 KB; 020904)
>libintl-2.dll (0.11.5.1189; 71 KB; 030404)
>libpng.dll (1.2.4.0; 220 KB; 020814)
>libxml2.dll (2.4.12.0; 626 KB; 011222)
>
>(did I miss some?)

zlib.dll is missing. The rest is the same.

You can compare the list with
http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2003-05/msg00224.html .

Regards,

         Holger



_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
address@hidden
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg