Re: dc: Undocumented feature ?

[Lack Mr G M]

In article <address@hidden>, address@hidden (Judicael Courant) writes:
|> 
|> I noticed that "s" is understood as an instruction by dc (It does not
|> answer that 's' is unimplemented) but it is nowhere described in the
|> info documentation. Is this a bug of dc or of its documentation ?

   From "man dc"

       sr     Pop the value off the top of the stack and store it
              into register r.

-- 
--------- Gordon Lack --------------- address@hidden  ------------
This message *may* reflect my personal opinion.  It is *not* intended
to reflect those of my employer, or anyone else.