[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#56974: 29.0.50; Missing documentation for former subr-x macros
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
bug#56974: 29.0.50; Missing documentation for former subr-x macros |
Date: |
Sun, 07 Aug 2022 14:51:26 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de> writes:
> Personally I don't care that much, both names are equally good (or bad).
> I would make them synonymous. Although when-let and and-let are already
> synonymous names...
There may be code problems in making when-let* and when-let synonymous
(for those that are using the outdated forms), so that's not easy to do.
But since we shouldn't document the differences, they're identical in
that way.
- bug#56974: 29.0.50; Missing documentation for former subr-x macros, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/08/04
- bug#56974: 29.0.50; Missing documentation for former subr-x macros, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/08/04
- bug#56974: 29.0.50; Missing documentation for former subr-x macros, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/08/05
- bug#56974: 29.0.50; Missing documentation for former subr-x macros, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/08/05
- bug#56974: 29.0.50; Missing documentation for former subr-x macros, Michael Heerdegen, 2022/08/05
- bug#56974: 29.0.50; Missing documentation for former subr-x macros, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/08/06
- bug#56974: 29.0.50; Missing documentation for former subr-x macros, Michael Heerdegen, 2022/08/06
- bug#56974: 29.0.50; Missing documentation for former subr-x macros,
Lars Ingebrigtsen <=
- bug#56974: 29.0.50; Missing documentation for former subr-x macros, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/08/09
- bug#56974: 29.0.50; Missing documentation for former subr-x macros, Po Lu, 2022/08/05