[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#56974: 29.0.50; Missing documentation for former subr-x macros
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
bug#56974: 29.0.50; Missing documentation for former subr-x macros |
Date: |
Fri, 05 Aug 2022 14:01:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> writes:
> +During complex computations that might at any step, one can combine a
Missing a word or two here?
> +For the sake of backwards compatibility, it is possible to write a
> +single binding without a binding list:
I'm not sure we need to document this bit.
> +@defmac if-let* (bindings@dots) then &rest else
> +@code{if-let*} is mostly equivalent to @code{if-let}, with the
> +exception that the legacy @code{(if (@var{var} (test)) foo bar)}
> +syntax is not permitted.
> +@end defmac
So I think it's sufficient to document only the *-less variant.
- bug#56974: 29.0.50; Missing documentation for former subr-x macros, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/08/04
- bug#56974: 29.0.50; Missing documentation for former subr-x macros, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/08/04
- bug#56974: 29.0.50; Missing documentation for former subr-x macros, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/08/05
- bug#56974: 29.0.50; Missing documentation for former subr-x macros,
Lars Ingebrigtsen <=
- bug#56974: 29.0.50; Missing documentation for former subr-x macros, Michael Heerdegen, 2022/08/05
- bug#56974: 29.0.50; Missing documentation for former subr-x macros, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/08/06
- bug#56974: 29.0.50; Missing documentation for former subr-x macros, Michael Heerdegen, 2022/08/06
- bug#56974: 29.0.50; Missing documentation for former subr-x macros, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/08/07
- bug#56974: 29.0.50; Missing documentation for former subr-x macros, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/08/09
- bug#56974: 29.0.50; Missing documentation for former subr-x macros, Po Lu, 2022/08/05