[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#45536: [PATCH] Pretty-print keys without <> around modifiers
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#45536: [PATCH] Pretty-print keys without <> around modifiers |
Date: |
Fri, 01 Jan 2021 14:00:24 +0200 |
> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, 45536@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2021 11:46:00 +0100
>
> Mattias Engdegård <mattiase@acm.org> writes:
>
> > 31 dec. 2020 kl. 10.59 skrev Mattias Engdegård <mattiase@acm.org>:
> >
> >> The manual uses it a bit everywhere, and rightly so.
> >
> > Correction: the manual uses the logical notation almost exclusively.
> > Perhaps the Reddit crowd has been fuming about this for decades, I
> > wouldn't know.
>
> The only instance I could find of "M-<[a-z]" was this from the manual?
>
> (kbd "C-M-<down>") @result{} [C-M-down]
What the manual uses is the format makeinfo emits for keys and key
sequences in the Info format. It is only very loosely related to the
way we format key sequences in Emacs.
bug#45536: [PATCH] Pretty-print keys without <> around modifiers,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#45536: [PATCH] Pretty-print keys without <> around modifiers, Mattias Engdegård, 2021/01/01
- bug#45536: [PATCH] Pretty-print keys without <> around modifiers, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/01
- bug#45536: [PATCH] Pretty-print keys without <> around modifiers, Mattias Engdegård, 2021/01/01
- bug#45536: [PATCH] Pretty-print keys without <> around modifiers, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/01
- bug#45536: [PATCH] Pretty-print keys without <> around modifiers, Mattias Engdegård, 2021/01/01
- bug#45536: [PATCH] Pretty-print keys without <> around modifiers, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/01
bug#45536: [PATCH] Pretty-print keys without <> around modifiers, Drew Adams, 2021/01/01