bug#32790: 27.0.50; point jumps unexpectedly after delete-window

[martin rudalics]

> But wait, maybe still 'switch-to-buffer-pop-to' would be a better name?
> I think now that maybe in future it might require an object like you
> already noted recently.

I think what Eli says is right - it should have a proper name.

> It could accept a list of buffer names that are allowed to be displayed
> with 'pop-to-buffer-same-window' like is accepted in the customizable
> variable 'same-window-buffer-names', or a list of regexps like in
> 'same-window-regexps'.

Those variables were a continuous annoyance because applications (and
Emacs core) added their buffers to those lists at will.  I'd rather
avoid such mischief.

martin