bug#32790: 27.0.50; point jumps unexpectedly after delete-window

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net>
> Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 01:47:53 +0200
> Cc: 32790@debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> But wait, maybe still 'switch-to-buffer-pop-to' would be a better name?

I find this name sub-optimal, as it doesn't make sense as an English
phrase, and doesn't describe well enough what it means.

How about switch-to-buffer-use-pop-to or maybe
switch-to-buffer-obey-display-actions?