bug#31888: 27.0.50; Segmentation fault in replace-buffer-contents

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com>
> Cc: monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA,  acm@muc.de,  31888@debbugs.gnu.org,  
> k.michal@zoho.com
> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 20:04:58 +0100
> 
> >> Is that worth the hassle?  The caller asked to replace the entire
> >> buffer by something else, why should they expect after-change hooks to
> >> be run on something other than the entire buffer?
> >
> > s/entire buffer/entire accessible portion of buffer/g
> 
> FWIW I use this on potentially small sections of the buffer, by first
> narrowing down to it.

In that case, the after-change hook will be called on the narrowed
portion of the buffer.