bug#31888: 27.0.50; Segmentation fault in replace-buffer-contents

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> Cc: acm@muc.de, 31888@debbugs.gnu.org, joaotavora@gmail.com, k.michal@zoho.com
> 
> Is that worth the hassle?  The caller asked to replace the entire
> buffer by something else, why should they expect after-change hooks to
> be run on something other than the entire buffer?

s/entire buffer/entire accessible portion of buffer/g