[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Codespell report for "gawk" (on fossies.org)
From: |
arnold |
Subject: |
Re: Codespell report for "gawk" (on fossies.org) |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Jan 2020 06:07:22 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Heirloom mailx 12.5 7/5/10 |
Fossies Administrator <address@hidden> wrote:
> > but it seems one
> > can just run "codespell" in command line with excluded words/files
> > provided by fossies.org:
> > https://fossies.org/linux/misc/gawk-5.0.1.tar.xz/codespell_conf.html#excl_words
>
> Yes, I forgot to mentioned that option. But I think this comfortable
> method is per se a bit dangerous and at least afterwards the source code
> differences have to be checked manually and corrected if necessary.
I agree. At least for me, I don't want to rely on a machine generated
diff and then hope I can catch all its mistakes. It's better to manually
fix things once, and then periodically check it.
Thanks,
Arnold
Re: Codespell report for "gawk" (on fossies.org), Fossies Administrator, 2020/01/15