bug-gawk
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Codespell report for "gawk" (on fossies.org)


From: arnold
Subject: Re: Codespell report for "gawk" (on fossies.org)
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:02:54 -0700
User-agent: Heirloom mailx 12.5 7/5/10

Hi.

Much thanks for this!  It's amusing to see some of the errors.
A number come from test cases written by non-English speakers. I suppose
I'll fix them just to help improve the score.

This is certainly a unique and unusual way to to contribute to
improving the quality of the code, but worthwhile.

Thanks!

Arnold

Fossies Administrator <address@hidden> wrote:

> Hi "gawk"-team,
>
> the FOSS server fossies.org - also supporting "gawk" - offers a new 
> feature "Source code misspelling reports":
>
>   https://fossies.org/features.html#codespell
>
> Such reports are normally only generated on request, but as Fossies 
> administrator I have just created (for testing purposes) an analysis for 
> the current "gawk" release 5.0.1:
>
>   https://fossies.org/linux/misc/gawk/codespell.html
>
> That version-independent (not linked) URL should redirect always to the 
> last report (if available), so currently to
>
>   https://fossies.org/linux/misc/gawk-5.0.1.tar.xz/codespell.html
>
> Although after a first review some obviously wrong matches ("false 
> positives") are already filtered out (ignored) please inform me if you 
> find more of them so that I can force a new improved check if applicable.
>
> Just for information there are also two supplemental pages
>
>   https://fossies.org/linux/misc/gawk/codespell_conf.html
>
> showing some used "codespell" configurations and
>
>   https://fossies.org/linux/misc/gawk/codespell_fps.html
>
> showing all resulting obvious "false positives".
>
> Although many of the found errors are in ChangeLog files or a "test" 
> directory I hope that the report can be nevertheless a little bit helpful.
>
> If appropriate, additional reports for the current or future development 
> versions could be created (but in a special "test" folder that isn't 
> integrated in the Fossies standard services and should - at least 
> principally - also not be accessible by search engines).
>
> Regards
>
> Jens
>
> -- 
> FOSSIES - The Fresh Open Source Software archive
> mainly for Internet, Engineering and Science
> https://fossies.org/



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]