[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: find -links n
From: |
Bernhard Voelker |
Subject: |
Re: find -links n |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Jul 2013 10:03:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5 |
On 07/14/2013 12:19 PM, Günter Wallnig wrote:
> I believe to have found a mistake in "find" with the param "-links":
>
> Apparently, only the second Column of the output of "ls" looks at what
> is probably wrong with a directory!
If I understand correct, then you are saying that the second column of
the "ls"-formatted output shows a different number than the number you
have been searching for with "-links N", e.g.
$ find -links 5 -ls
17311045 4 drwxr-xr-x 5 berny users 4096 Dec 9 2011
./gnulib/.git/refs
15481120 4 drwxr-xr-x 5 berny users 4096 Dec 9 2011
./.git/refs
16913157 4 drwxr-xr-x 5 berny users 4096 Mar 27 19:57
./find/testsuite
22825398 32 drwxr-xr-x 5 berny users 32768 Mar 27 19:56 ./tests
This is the output format of "ls -dils" as mentioned in the manual.
The 2nd column isn't the number of links but instead the number of
1k-blocks used for this file/directory. The number of links is in
column 4.
Have a nice day,
Berny
- find -links n, Günter Wallnig, 2013/07/14
- Re: find -links n,
Bernhard Voelker <=