[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] fix bugs in run_in_dir ()
From: |
James Youngman |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] fix bugs in run_in_dir () |
Date: |
Fri, 7 May 2010 10:05:06 +0100 |
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Kamil Dudka <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Friday 07 of May 2010 10:41:03 James Youngman wrote:
> The man page says:
>
> As with the -exec action, the `+' form of -execdir will build a command
> line to process more than one matched file, but any given invocation of
> command will only list files that exist in the same subdirectory.
>
> And it didn't process "more than one matched file", so I considered it as
> bug, too. Moreover the same used to work before the migration to fts.
Yes. I think the manpage should be phrased more carefully.
>> If you'd like to supply a backported "format-patch" patch against the
>> 4.4.x tree, I can apply that too.
>
> It may sound stupid, but where can I get the upstream 4.4.x branch from?
git clone git://git.savannah.gnu.org/findutils.git
git pull origin rel-4-4-fixes:rel-4-4-fixes
>
> The backport is currenlty pending our internal review, so that it makes
> sense to hold on for a while. I'll then provide the patches based on the
> upstream 4.4.x HEAD.
>
> Kamil
>
- [PATCH] fix bugs in run_in_dir (), Kamil Dudka, 2010/05/06
- Re: [PATCH] fix bugs in run_in_dir (), Kamil Dudka, 2010/05/06
- Re: [PATCH] fix bugs in run_in_dir (), James Youngman, 2010/05/07
- Re: [PATCH] fix bugs in run_in_dir (), Kamil Dudka, 2010/05/07
- backport of patches for upstream bugs #19593 and #27563, Kamil Dudka, 2010/05/10
- Re: backport of patches for upstream bugs #19593 and #27563, James Youngman, 2010/05/17
- Re: backport of patches for upstream bugs #19593 and #27563, Kamil Dudka, 2010/05/17
- Re: backport of patches for upstream bugs #19593 and #27563, James Youngman, 2010/05/17
- [PATCH v2] backport of patches for upstream bugs #19593 and #27563, Kamil Dudka, 2010/05/18