[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] fix bugs in run_in_dir ()
From: |
Kamil Dudka |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] fix bugs in run_in_dir () |
Date: |
Fri, 7 May 2010 10:21:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.10 |
On Friday 07 of May 2010 10:08:08 James Youngman wrote:
> Thanks for spotting this. I can see the bug simply by inspecting
> your fix. But, is there any kind of test case which actually
> demonstrates the problem? If we add a relevant test we can protect
> ourselves against reintroducing this kind of bug, too.
As I said, I hit the bug in 4.4.2. The code that the patch addresses works
in 4.5.9 without the patch, but not in 4.4.2. The failing test-case was
execdir-multiple.exp. It simply broke the traversal as soon as the first
execdir had been executed. FWIW the full backport for upstream bugs #19593
and #27563 is attached to the corresponding Fedora bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/493143
Kamil
- [PATCH] fix bugs in run_in_dir (), Kamil Dudka, 2010/05/06
- Re: [PATCH] fix bugs in run_in_dir (), Kamil Dudka, 2010/05/06
- Re: [PATCH] fix bugs in run_in_dir (), James Youngman, 2010/05/07
- Re: [PATCH] fix bugs in run_in_dir (),
Kamil Dudka <=
- backport of patches for upstream bugs #19593 and #27563, Kamil Dudka, 2010/05/10
- Re: backport of patches for upstream bugs #19593 and #27563, James Youngman, 2010/05/17
- Re: backport of patches for upstream bugs #19593 and #27563, Kamil Dudka, 2010/05/17
- Re: backport of patches for upstream bugs #19593 and #27563, James Youngman, 2010/05/17
- [PATCH v2] backport of patches for upstream bugs #19593 and #27563, Kamil Dudka, 2010/05/18