[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: a few Q's
From: |
Mark D. Baushke |
Subject: |
Re: a few Q's |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Oct 2003 14:11:20 -0700 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Derek Robert Price <derek@ximbiot.com> writes:
> Mark D. Baushke wrote:
>
> | It also bothers me that this kind of feature could be used by someone
> | that wanted to checkout trees from a normal repository and not leave a
> | record of it in the history file...
>
>
> Good point. I don't like that either. Is something stopping people
> from running the server with the -R option?
A fine idea for a :pserver: server. Not so good for a :ext: server.
I suppose a game using CVS_SERVER to run a script that passes the -R
switch to the real cvs might also work, but could be more confusing to
use... and still open to abuse by a user rather than an administrator.
> Aside from the fact that they would have to have a second cvs server
> on a second port serving their non-read-only repositories?
I suspect that burning another port would probably not be a big hardship
for :pserver: users.
> It seems to me that -R should just be a server side/local switch
> anyhow. Aside from the security implications,
Well, the security implications are kind of big to ignore...
> why would you want to make your users remember which repositories they
> need to send -R to?
Good point.
> At least a separate port number would only be need to be specified
> once - after that it would be remembered as part of the CVSROOT
> string.
True for :pserver: and maybe :gserver: and painful for :ext:, which is
probably okay as making it available via :pserver: lets the
administrator control how the history file gets updated.
-- Mark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE/mZV43x41pRYZE/gRAsUsAJ9Di4eV/HE7kYCVC0D22cVR4y+scACeMGpN
F83PxujhmOFO7wHgPfDFDng=
=nQ70
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- a few Q's, Christos Zoulas, 2003/10/22
- Re: a few Q's, Mark D. Baushke, 2003/10/22
- Re: a few Q's, Christos Zoulas, 2003/10/22
- Re: a few Q's, Mark D. Baushke, 2003/10/23
- Re: a few Q's, Derek Robert Price, 2003/10/24
- Re: a few Q's, Mark D. Baushke, 2003/10/24
- Re: a few Q's, Derek Robert Price, 2003/10/24
- Re: a few Q's,
Mark D. Baushke <=
- Re: a few Q's, Derek Robert Price, 2003/10/24
- Re: a few Q's, Christos Zoulas, 2003/10/24
- Re: a few Q's, Mark D. Baushke, 2003/10/25
- Re: a few Q's, Derek Robert Price, 2003/10/26
Re: a few Q's, Derek Robert Price, 2003/10/24
Message not available