[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: backwards compatibility problem with .cvspass?

From: Karl Fogel
Subject: Re: backwards compatibility problem with .cvspass?
Date: 27 Dec 2000 12:39:22 -0600

"Derek R. Price" <address@hidden> writes:
> > I'm curious why you say it will take a little longer to run.  I
> > assumed we'd just treat the absence of an explicit port number as
> > being like an explicit 2401.  That shouldn't require more than a few
> > nanoseconds of overhead... Or is there an issue I'm missing here?
> Each line in .cvspass was previously undergoing a simple strcmp against the
> current CVSROOT.  I'm going to have to parse each line and normalize then
> compare.

Oh, I see.  Yes, more time to a machine, but not noticeable at human
speeds (that's all I was concerned with).


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]