bug-coreutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#20442: bug+patch: du output misaligned on different terminals


From: Linda Walsh
Subject: bug#20442: bug+patch: du output misaligned on different terminals
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 14:36:18 -0700
User-agent: Thunderbird



Pádraig Brady wrote: > There are backwards compatibility issues to
consider.

Could you demonstrate any where similar issues wouldn't affect output
from 'ls'

Second, I don't remember numfmt being part being part of posix, but my
solution seems to fall under POSIX:



From: Pádraig Brady Subject: Re: du: POSIX mandating a single space instead of tab? Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 16:51:06 +0100 User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0

On 28/04/15 15:42, Eric Blake wrote:

No, the space stands for any (positive) amount of white space. http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap05.html#tag_05
Andreas.

Thanks for pointing that out Andreas. So a ' ' in a format implies any amount of blank chars.

Correct.

So we could separate the du columns with spaces rather than tab,


Yes, I'd prefer that we did that.  It is much easier to guarantee
alignment when using spaces and completely avoiding whatever tab stops
people have set up.

=====

I find myself agreeing with Eric on this issue.

Actually, I would prefer a envvar USE_TABS=[[ytfnx]] (yes true
false/no/false/no/expand) and their upper-case versions for simplicity
as defaulting to 8 space/tab -- though I could also support the absence
of 'USE_TABS' as being compatible with current functionality.

I can see the use of something like this in desktop programs tty/consoles,
editors, etc...


I would want to see standard column terminology (ala sort & cut ranging
from 1 - 80).


If the var is undefined, I think it would be _more_ _predictable_ to go go with
expanded as '8', OR with like the tty_tabs command w/no args: it shows
you the current settings.  (Why doesn't 'tabs' show them?)

However -- it we agree on the env-var for tab presence/expansion and tabstop
definitions, I could also agree on leaving behaviors in current programs the
same as they are now (w/o the USE_TABS envvar).

tabs

tabs: no tab-list given  --- hmmm not too useful

tabs 2 -- also tabs doesn't take columns but spaces of separation.
Tabstops are usually at set points like 1/2" or 1/4" or some fixed
number, so if I use tabs 2:, One might like 'tabs' to display the
current tabs: > tty_tab

(from 1, tabs skip to column: 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31
33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 71 73 75 77 79
80
I note the tab program also supports irregular tabs:

for i in a a2 c c2 c3 f p s u;do tabs -$i tty_tab done
(from 1, tabs skip to column: 10 16 36 72 80 (from 1, tabs skip to column: 10 16 40 72 80 (from 1, tabs skip to column: 8 20 55 80 (from 1, tabs skip to column: 6 10 14 49 80 (from 1, tabs skip to column: 6 10 22 26 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 67 80 (from 1, tabs skip to column: 7 11 15 19 23 80 (from 1, tabs skip to column: 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 49 53 80 (from 1, tabs skip to column: 10 55 80 (from 1, tabs skip to column: 12 20 44 80
-----------------

I would like to see this in an ENV var so people could use it for
other utils in their session (like vim/emacs or whatever).

Some files like the /etc/fstab file really need variable tabs.







reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]