[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: chown should catch null owner:group
From: |
jidanni |
Subject: |
Re: chown should catch null owner:group |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Feb 2008 04:28:26 +0800 |
EB> `:'
EB> ~ If only a colon is given, or if NEW-OWNER is empty, neither the
EB> ~ owner nor the group is changed.
OK, I'll drop my case, but please add a comment to this documentation
about "why" or "who knows why?" or the motivation behind or uses of,
this case.
Perhaps "just to be orthogonal".
Else people wonder what's up the sleeve.
JM> I think it makes sense to diagnose a spec of "." as invalid.
OK, you dudes take it from here. Thanks.
- Re: chown should catch null owner:group, (continued)
- Re: chown should catch null owner:group, Matthew Woehlke, 2008/02/15
- Re: chown should catch null owner:group, Paul Eggert, 2008/02/15
- Re: chown should catch null owner:group, jidanni, 2008/02/15
- Re: chown should catch null owner:group, Eric Blake, 2008/02/15
- Re: chown should catch null owner:group, Linda Walsh, 2008/02/18
- Re: chown should catch null owner:group, jidanni, 2008/02/18
- Re: chown should catch null owner:group, Eric Blake, 2008/02/18
- Re: chown should catch null owner:group, Linda Walsh, 2008/02/18
- Re: chown should catch null owner:group, Jim Meyering, 2008/02/18
- Re: chown should catch null owner:group, Eric Blake, 2008/02/18
- Re: chown should catch null owner:group,
jidanni <=