[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bison/flex compatibility revisited

From: John
Subject: Re: Bison/flex compatibility revisited
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:39:19 -0500 (EST)

> One exception that I neglected to mention is that if
> the flex option for reentrant code is used, YY_G,
> the related structure, and the definitions of yyout
> etc. that use YY_G may be required.

Any code that explicitly references YY_G is broken. YY_G is an
internal macro, and subject to change.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]