[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bison/flex compatibility revisited

From: John
Subject: Re: Bison/flex compatibility revisited
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 22:35:11 -0500 (EST)

> Has anybody profiled a static lexical analyzer to see how much
> overhead the yyget_out etc. function calls add to run time?

It would be unnoticable.

> I cannot imagine a scenario where I specify a prefix foo and *don't*
> want the equivalent of #define yylex foolex, etc.  Can you?

Yes, if there is an existing function "yylex" (or "yy_whatever"), and
you don't want to clash with it. This is why namespaces were invented.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]