[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/11953] objcopy is broken
From: |
amodra at gmail dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/11953] objcopy is broken |
Date: |
28 Aug 2010 13:43:44 -0000 |
------- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-08-28 13:43
-------
(In reply to comment #4)
Can you at least tell me the vendor?
Why does strip from binutils-2.20.51.0.8 work? Because it has a different set
of bugs to the latest binutils. Sometimes a fix for one bug is wrong,
introducing a new bug. Sometimes a fix isn't wrong itself but exposes another
bug, which is what happened in this case.
Patch at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-08/msg00360.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11953
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [Bug binutils/11953] New: objcopy is broken, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com, 2010/08/27
- [Bug binutils/11953] objcopy is broken, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com, 2010/08/27
- [Bug binutils/11953] objcopy is broken, jeff dot chua dot linux at gmail dot com, 2010/08/27
- [Bug binutils/11953] objcopy is broken, amodra at gmail dot com, 2010/08/28
- [Bug binutils/11953] objcopy is broken, amodra at gmail dot com, 2010/08/28
- [Bug binutils/11953] objcopy is broken, jeff dot chua dot linux at gmail dot com, 2010/08/28
- [Bug binutils/11953] objcopy is broken, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com, 2010/08/28
- [Bug binutils/11953] objcopy is broken, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com, 2010/08/28
- [Bug binutils/11953] objcopy is broken,
amodra at gmail dot com <=
- [Bug binutils/11953] objcopy is broken, jeff dot chua dot linux at gmail dot com, 2010/08/28
- [Bug binutils/11953] objcopy is broken, amodra at gmail dot com, 2010/08/30