[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/11953] objcopy is broken
From: |
amodra at gmail dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/11953] objcopy is broken |
Date: |
28 Aug 2010 10:47:32 -0000 |
------- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-08-28 10:47
-------
What toolchain produced DivaP? I'm asking because the headers are not
consistent. If you look at section header offsets and program header offsets,
you'll see that .note.ABI-tag is part of the first PT_LOAD header. The header
p_paddr and p_offset along with the section sh_offset gives .note.ABI-tag a
section lma of 0x8049094. However, the PT_NOTE header also contains
.note.ABI-tag, but the PT_NOTE p_paddr says the section lma should be 0x8048094.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11953
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [Bug binutils/11953] New: objcopy is broken, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com, 2010/08/27
- [Bug binutils/11953] objcopy is broken, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com, 2010/08/27
- [Bug binutils/11953] objcopy is broken, jeff dot chua dot linux at gmail dot com, 2010/08/27
- [Bug binutils/11953] objcopy is broken,
amodra at gmail dot com <=
- [Bug binutils/11953] objcopy is broken, amodra at gmail dot com, 2010/08/28
- [Bug binutils/11953] objcopy is broken, jeff dot chua dot linux at gmail dot com, 2010/08/28
- [Bug binutils/11953] objcopy is broken, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com, 2010/08/28
- [Bug binutils/11953] objcopy is broken, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com, 2010/08/28
- [Bug binutils/11953] objcopy is broken, amodra at gmail dot com, 2010/08/28
- [Bug binutils/11953] objcopy is broken, jeff dot chua dot linux at gmail dot com, 2010/08/28
- [Bug binutils/11953] objcopy is broken, amodra at gmail dot com, 2010/08/30