[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Return from function depending on number of parameters
From: |
Chris Elvidge |
Subject: |
Re: Return from function depending on number of parameters |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Jul 2020 10:14:38 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 |
On 05/07/2020 06:24 pm, Chet Ramey wrote:
On 7/4/20 12:23 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
Quoting Chet liberally from
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2012-04/msg00034.html:
It dates from Posix circa 1990 (1003.2d9, of which I've lost my paper
copy). I implemented it after the Berkeley guys, mostly Marc
Teitelbaum, put it into Posix. It ended up getting dropped in favor
of the ksh $((...)) expansion, at which point everyone deprecated the
old $[...]. I removed it from the manual sometime later, but it still
works as it always has.
This all remains true. I probably won't remove it, but nobody should use it
in new code.
The reason I tried $[...] stems from some code I found re. autosetting
the colour of the return code from the previous command, and autosetting
the colour of the prompt depending on user id (PS1). Viz:
# see: http://linuxcommand.org/lc3_adv_tput.php
# blacK Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan White bolD Normal
unset fcol bcol col
declare -A bcol
declare -A fcol
declare -a col
col=( k r g y b m c w d n )
for i in {0..7}; do
bcol[${col[i]}]="$(tput setab $i)"
fcol[${col[i]}]="$(tput setaf $i)"
done
fcol[d]="$(tput bold)"
fcol[n]="$(tput sgr0)"
#
# user colour: red for root; green for others (>0)
ucol=( "$(tput setaf 1)" "$(tput setaf 2)" )
# exit colour: green for 0; red for errors (>0)
ecol=( "$(tput setaf 2)" "$(tput setaf 1)" )
# I don't know where I found this.
# Probably somewhere in Greg Wooledge's wiki
# I can't find it again, now!!
# note use of [!!$?]
# !!$? in an arithmetic context does a logical negation
# of the exit status twice, which maps 0 to 0, and non-zero to 1.
# also user id [!!$(id -u)]
export PS1='\[${fcol[d]}${ecol[!!$?]}\][$?] \[${ucol[!!$(id
-u)]}\]\h\[${fcol[b]}\]!\[${ucol[!!$(id
-u)]}\]\u\[${fcol[w]}\]:(`tty|cut -d/ -f3-`):\D{%a %d %b %Y %I:%M %P
%Z}:`pwd`\n\$\[${fcol[n]}\] '
I somehow thought that [...] forced 'arithmetic context', so I tried it.
Are the two uses (array subscript and arithmetic context) of [...]
connected/related? Or am I (stupidly) seeing a connection where none
really exists?
Thanks
--
Chris Elvidge
England
- Return from function depending on number of parameters, Chris Elvidge, 2020/07/03
- Re: Return from function depending on number of parameters, Lawrence Velázquez, 2020/07/03
- Re: Return from function depending on number of parameters, Chris Elvidge, 2020/07/04
- Re: Return from function depending on number of parameters, pepa65, 2020/07/04
- Re: Return from function depending on number of parameters, Oğuz, 2020/07/04
- Re: Return from function depending on number of parameters, Lawrence Velázquez, 2020/07/04
- Re: Return from function depending on number of parameters, Chet Ramey, 2020/07/05
- Re: Return from function depending on number of parameters,
Chris Elvidge <=
- Re: Return from function depending on number of parameters, Chet Ramey, 2020/07/10
- Re: Return from function depending on number of parameters, Greg Wooledge, 2020/07/10
Re: Return from function depending on number of parameters, Chris Elvidge, 2020/07/04
Re: Return from function depending on number of parameters, Eli Schwartz, 2020/07/03
Re: Return from function depending on number of parameters, Greg Wooledge, 2020/07/06