[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.67] testsuite: 199 246 failed
|
From: |
Eric Blake |
|
Subject: |
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.67] testsuite: 199 246 failed |
|
Date: |
Wed, 04 Aug 2010 15:02:18 -0600 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100720 Fedora/3.1.1-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b2pre Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.1 |
On 08/04/2010 02:03 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> * Eric Blake wrote on Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 09:44:09PM CEST:
>> On 08/04/2010 01:08 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>>> -# We cannot assume aclocal won't warn (aclocal-1.9 does not understand -W*
>>> -# options), so check autoconf only.
>>> -AT_CHECK([autoconf --force -Wno-syntax], 0, [ignore], [stderr])
>>> +AT_CHECK([autoreconf -v --force -Wno-syntax], 0, [ignore], [stderr])
>>
>> Doesn't autoreconf still want to run aclocal under the hood, even if you
>> manually touched aclocal.m4? The rest of the patch made sense, but I'm
>> not sure about the logic of this hunk.
>
> No, it shouldn't ever run aclocal in this setting:
See what a bit more research on my part would have done? ;) You're free
to push that patch - I agree that testing autoreconf as a whole is
better than testing the pieces.
--
Eric Blake address@hidden +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature