bug-auctex
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug-AUCTeX] Re: 2005-06-15; wrong-type-argument with LaTeX-includegraph


From: Franz Haeuslschmid
Subject: [Bug-AUCTeX] Re: 2005-06-15; wrong-type-argument with LaTeX-includegraphics-read-file-relative
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 08:41:38 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) XEmacs/21.4.10 (usg-unix-v)

Ralf Angeli writes:

> * Franz Haeuslschmid (2005-06-15) writes:
>
>> I am getting a `wrong-type-argument' error in a multi-file
>> document, when I try to
>>
>> (setq LaTeX-includegraphics-read-file
>>       (quote LaTeX-includegraphics-read-file-relative))
> [...]
>> Emacs  : XEmacs 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" [Lucid] (i586-pc-win32) of 
>> Fri Apr 22 2005 on PAN
>
>>From the doc string of the variable:
>
> ,----[ C-h v LaTeX-includegraphics-read-file RET ]
> | `LaTeX-includegraphics-read-file-relative' lists all graphic files
> | in the master directory and its subdirectories and inserts the
> | relative file name.  This option doesn't works with Emacs 21.3 or
> | XEmacs.
> `----

[...]

Quite true, I should read the variable documentation more
carefully or at least hesitate to write "bug" reports so late in
the evening.  Anyway, as I prepared the report, it stroke me,
that the process of inserting macros is not transactional.  I
mean, when I'm hit by an error or decide to abort to insert a
macro, e.g. when I'm prompted to insert a file, the edited buffer
should be in the state, that it was before hitting `C-c RET'.

I don't know AUCTeX's internals, but is something like that hard
to implement?  Of course, this is more a feature request or a
suggestion for an improvement.

Franz.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]