Re: sparse vector 'without' returns ⍬ with sufficiently large vector

[Rowan Cannaday]

Sorry for the late reply. I was out venturing for groceries, which has turned into a significantly more stressful task than anticipated it would.

Thanks to responders who have provided simpler demonstrations of the effect.

- Rowan

On Thu, Apr 30, 2020, 3:30 PM Kacper Gutowski <address@hidden> wrote:

On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 11:17:20PM +0400, Ala'a Mohammad wrote:
>I suspect It has something to do with Zero value.
>
>Kacper example also produce output when Zero is replaced with other
>values.

Zero isn't stricly needed to reproduce: (61⍴10) ~ 60⍴¯10
I didn't try to properly debug it, but the bug is in
Bif_F12_WITHOUT::large_eval_AB which is used for A~B
when 3600<(⍴A)×⍴B.

-k