Re: sparse vector 'without' returns ⍬ with sufficiently large vector

[Kacper Gutowski]

On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 11:17:20PM +0400, Ala'a Mohammad wrote:
> I suspect It has something to do with Zero value.
>
> Kacper example also produce output when Zero is replaced with other 
> values.

Zero isn't stricly needed to reproduce: (61⍴10) ~ 60⍴¯10
I didn't try to properly debug it, but the bug is in 
Bif_F12_WITHOUT::large_eval_AB which is used for A~B 
when 3600<(⍴A)×⍴B.

-k