bug-apl
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-apl] A modest proposal: user-defined commands


From: Juergen Sauermann
Subject: Re: [Bug-apl] A modest proposal: user-defined commands
Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 12:40:05 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130330 Thunderbird/17.0.5

Hi David,

 I think they should because commands work outside of workspaces.
Think of one workspace installing commands and another using them.
You can ]USERCMD REMOVE-ALL to remove all commands.

/// Jürgen


On 05/06/2014 09:41 PM, David Lamkins wrote:

Thank you.

One more thing: ]usercmd definitions probably shouldn't survive )load and )clear.

On May 6, 2014 10:57 AM, "Juergen Sauermann" <address@hidden> wrote:
Hi David.

thanks. Removing first and printing then was maybe not so smart. SVN 251.

/// Jürgen


On 05/06/2014 06:47 PM, David B. Lamkins wrote:
Thank you, Jürgen! That'll do what I need.

FYI, I'm seeing a bit of cruft on the REMOVE:

       ]usercmd remove ]foo
     User-defined command \371\217\212\277\200

(Tested in both gnu-apl-mode [as above] and in a terminal. Only
difference is that the terminal shows unprintable `?' glyphs instead of
the escaped values.)




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]