Thank you.
One more thing: ]usercmd definitions probably shouldn't survive )load and )clear.
On May 6, 2014 10:57 AM, "Juergen Sauermann" <
address@hidden> wrote:
Hi David.
thanks. Removing first and printing then was maybe not so smart. SVN 251.
/// Jürgen
On 05/06/2014 06:47 PM, David B. Lamkins wrote:
Thank you, Jürgen! That'll do what I need.
FYI, I'm seeing a bit of cruft on the REMOVE:
]usercmd remove ]foo
User-defined command \371\217\212\277\200
(Tested in both gnu-apl-mode [as above] and in a terminal. Only
difference is that the terminal shows unprintable `?' glyphs instead of
the escaped values.)