[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: push parser
From: |
Joel E. Denny |
Subject: |
Re: push parser |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:46:54 -0500 (EST) |
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Yes to both cases, if it's a local variable or parameter. I prefer
> putting 'const' after the type it modifies, for consistency; and for
> local vars I generally prefer omitting a final 'const' as it clutters
> the code for too-small an advantage.
Thanks.
> Sorry I haven't had time to read all the patches recently....
I'll continue to alert you when I feel especially unsure of something.
- Re: push parser, (continued)
- Re: push parser, Bob Rossi, 2006/12/08
- Re: push parser, Joel E. Denny, 2006/12/08
- Re: push parser, Bob Rossi, 2006/12/08
- Re: push parser, Joel E. Denny, 2006/12/08
- Re: push parser, Bob Rossi, 2006/12/08
- Re: push parser, Joel E. Denny, 2006/12/08
- Re: push parser, Joel E. Denny, 2006/12/08
- Re: push parser, Bob Rossi, 2006/12/10
- Re: push parser, Joel E. Denny, 2006/12/12
- Re: push parser, Paul Eggert, 2006/12/12
- Re: push parser,
Joel E. Denny <=
- Re: push parser, Bob Rossi, 2006/12/13
- Re: push parser, Joel E. Denny, 2006/12/13
- Re: push parser, Bob Rossi, 2006/12/13
- Re: push parser, Joel E. Denny, 2006/12/13
- Re: push parser, Bob Rossi, 2006/12/14
- Re: push parser, Joel E. Denny, 2006/12/14
- Re: push parser, Bob Rossi, 2006/12/14
- Re: push parser, Joel E. Denny, 2006/12/14
- Re: push parser, Bob Rossi, 2006/12/14
- Re: push parser, Joel E. Denny, 2006/12/15