bibulus-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

## [Bibulus-users] entry type for medievalists

 From: Jesse Billett Subject: [Bibulus-users] entry type for medievalists Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:01:26 +0000

Dear Bibulus users and developers,


I have just been made aware of your exciting project after spending a couple of weeks snooping around BibTeX .bst files to see if there's anything suitable for my research, and have found nothing. Zero. Therefore, I thought you might like some input from a hopeful user of your software who has, it's sad to say, no training as a developer.


I study medieval history and liturgy. Like all medievalists, many of the sources with which I work are medieval manuscripts. These are referenced in bibliographies in forms similar to this:

City, Library, Shelfmark
e.g. London, British Library, MS Royal 2.A.10


For citations within the text, sometimes more information is necessary, such as referring to a folio number, taking the form "fol. 221", or "fols. i--x, 12--27." (Medieval books are rarely numbered with pages, though this sometimes happens and would require an option.)


The first citation in a chapter would need to indicate the date of the manuscript, its place of origin, and often a standard reference work in which it is cited, and perhaps books where the manuscript might be edited, reproduced in facsimile, or discussed in detail:


Florence, Biblioteca Laurenziana, MS Amiatino I, {\em CLA} III, 299: s. vii--viii (before A.D. 716), Jarrow or Wearmouth, Northumbria; see E. A. Lowe, {\em English Uncial} (Oxford, 1960), pp. 11--12, nn. 12--13, Plates VIII and IX; B. Bischoff, {\em Latin Paleography: Antiquity to the Middle Ages}, tr. D. \'{O} Cr\'{o}in\'{\i}n and D. Ganz (Cambridge, 1999), pp. 71 and 199.

So this would require the following traditional BibTeX-style fields:

Address:                Florence
Library:                Biblioteca Laurenziana

Shelfmark: Amiatino I (the MS prefix doesn't apply to all styles... needs to be optional)
Pagerange:      [empty if all]

Date: s. vii--viii (before A.D. 716) [ "s" here is for the Latin "saecula", and refers
                        to the centuries when the book might have been made]
Origin:         Jarrow or Wearmouth, Northumbria

Standardref: \CLA III, 299 % (use a macro for abbreviated names. This one is
                        "Codices   Latini Antiquiories", a standard ref. work)
Edition:                [citation key for an edition of the manuscript]
Seealso:                [pp.~11--12, nn.~12--13, Plates VIII, IX]{Lowe:1960}
[pp. 71, 199]{Bischoff:1999}


I hope you might find this an appropriate entry type. It would certainly broaden the appeal of Bibulus. I am in touch with an expanding circle of medieval researchers who have found LaTeX to be very useful. This would help them a lot. In the meantime, I'm looking into modifying the jurabib style to see if it might work.

Best wishes,

Jesse Billett

Faculty of History
King's College
Cambridge University
Cambridge, UK CB2 1ST



reply via email to

 [Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]
• [Bibulus-users] entry type for medievalists, Jesse Billett <=