Re: [Axiom-developer] "has" and "with" (was curious algebra failure)

[Bill Page]

On 8/12/07, William Sit wrote:
>
> Ah, of course (SandBox), stupid me!
> Thanks for "upgrading" the page.
>

Don't worry. Editing and correcting it first as a SandBox page and
then renaming it is often the best way.

> Now I wonder if I should remove my wrong conjecture on
> "has" has higher precedence. What do you think (as a
> general principle, should wrong explanations be removed)?
>

Well, it's up to you but I would suggest maybe leave it a while in
case your thoughts about this trigger comments from other readers.
Later after readers have had a chance to make their own comments you
can "clean it up" if you like so that it represents the correct or at
least consensus opinion.

In general I would only remove "wrong explanations" if they could be
misleading and are not identified as such.

Thanks for your work on this!

Regards,
Bill Page.