[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avrdude-dev] [bug #40831] LUFA AVRISP-MKII fails with avrdude 6.0.1
From: |
Colin O'Flynn |
Subject: |
Re: [avrdude-dev] [bug #40831] LUFA AVRISP-MKII fails with avrdude 6.0.1 |
Date: |
Wed, 8 Oct 2014 08:47:53 -0300 |
Hi Joerg,
Alright great! Will make the cosmetic changes along with some test code for
the STK600. The only difference is I think the STK600 has an interrupt
endpoint (this is from memory so is frequently wrong), so need some
additional detection code. Will look into the JTAGICE3 as well.
Warm Regards,
-Colin O'Flynn
-----Original Message-----
From: Joerg Wunsch [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: October-08-14 8:04 AM
To: Colin O'Flynn
Cc: address@hidden; 'Dean Camera'
Subject: Re: [avrdude-dev] [bug #40831] LUFA AVRISP-MKII fails with avrdude
6.0.1
As Colin O'Flynn wrote:
> Did you have a chance to look at my partial patch (partial as it
> doesn't have STK600 stuff in it yet)? It's posted as the latest
> comment at https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?40831.
Except for the formatting (*), I think it's fine. I didn't test it though
against a LUFA mkII clone not using the standard (Atmel) EP numbering.
(*) Bear in mind that the hard TABs in the remainder of usb_libusb.c are
meant to be each 8 columns (DEC VT100 standard). It's debatable whether we
might not rather convert everything to not using TABs, but if so, it should
be handled in a separate commit that only touches these "cosmetic" things.
> If it seems OK let me know & will give the STK600 stuff a try too.
> I'll need someone else to verify that portion as don't have that hardware.
STK600 is probably not that hard (and I can test it). The biggest challenge
is going to be the JTAGICE3 in both incarnations, v2.x and v3.x (CMSIS-DAP)
firmware.
--
cheers, Joerg .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)