Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude on Windows

[E. Weddington]

On 13 Feb 2003 at 21:29, Joerg Wunsch wrote:

> As E. Weddington wrote:
> 
> > > Per definitionem, that's the same.
> 
> > I know. I just prefer *explicit* definitions as I was planning on
> > using the values as offsets.
> 
> You still can, even without the explicit definitions, as long as
> your C implementation adhers to the standard. :)

Know that too. I just have a preference for explicit definitions. 
There's always the possibility that you get somebody who doesn't know 
they have implicit values and tries to monkey around with them.

Eric